The debate around Minimum Support Prices (MSP) reform has intensified in 2025, shaped by evolving procurement patterns, rising fiscal pressures, and the need to realign support systems with climate-resilient agriculture. Recent updates from the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare point to a decisive strengthening of India’s MSP architecture in both outreach and fiscal depth. The number of farmers benefiting from procurement has increased from 1.63 crore in 2021–22 to 1.84 crore in the 2024–25 cycle, supported by MSP disbursements rising from ₹2.25 lakh crore to ₹3.33 lakh crore over the same period—more than a threefold expansion since 2014–15.
From an economic standpoint, crops covered under MSP reform directly impact rural consumption, food inflation, and the agri-GDP trajectory. According to recent communications from the Ministry of Agriculture, procurement volumes in key states have remained uneven, highlighting the continued dependence of farmers on assured prices for liquidity. The following are the key challenges observed in the MSP reform.
Structural Constraints in Procurement and Fiscal Pressures
A core challenge is that MSP procurement remains concentrated in wheat and paddy, slowing progress on diversification toward oilseeds, pulses, and horticulture. This concentration increases subsidy outflows, as procurement often surpasses PDS absorption capacity. Budget data for FY 2025–26 reflects upward revisions in food subsidy estimates due to inflation-linked procurement costs. As I see it, this creates a structural ceiling on how far MSP expansion can practically go without redesigning downstream distribution.
Stakeholder Concerns Across Farmers, Markets, and States
Farmers seek predictability amid rising input costs, while state agencies face storage shortages and cash-flow stress due to delayed settlement cycles. Markets also express concerns that MSP may distort price discovery in globally sensitive commodities. Ministry of Commerce briefs show strong export responsiveness in segments such as basmati, spices, and processed items, indicating the need to balance market-driven pricing with food-security objectives.
Financial, Audit, and Compliance Implications
From a financial viewpoint, inconsistent settlement timelines create reconciliation challenges across state procurement bodies. Subsidy accounting, classification of support under WTO norms, and the audit trail for procurement-linked payments require increasingly robust controls. Any shift towards deficiency-payment schemes or targeted incentives would heighten the importance of transparent cost-of-cultivation datasets and digitised procurement records.
A Look at The Future
Addressing these challenges will require a calibrated redesign of the MSP ecosystem; one that shifts from volume-focused procurement to a more diversified, efficiency-driven model. From a policy standpoint, expanding structured procurement in pulses and oilseeds, supported by improved storage, decentralised processing, and clearer price-stabilisation frameworks, can ease fiscal pressure while aligning with nutritional and import-substitution priorities.
Strengthening settlement discipline through end-to-end digitised workflows, interoperable procurement platforms, and real-time reconciliation would help reduce cash-flow strain for state agencies and improve audit reliability. At the same time, integrating market intelligence into MSP revisions, particularly for globally sensitive commodities, can help maintain competitiveness without undermining income stability.
In my view, the most durable reform path is one that balances predictable farmer support with transparent cost datasets, diversified procurement channels, and tighter financial controls, enabling MSP to function as a targeted risk-mitigation tool rather than a blanket obligation.
Uploaded On: 
Author: 
